– Advertisement –

Leaked Emails Show That FBC Naples’ Members Had Serious Concerns About Marcus Hayes’ Biblical Qualifications

by | Nov 2, 2019 | Blog, News, Politics | 0 comments

💡We need your support. As big tech continues its crackdown on conservative blogs, our days on these platforms are numbered. Go Ad-Free plus get Exclusive Member-Only content by subscribing to us on Substack!

Reformation Charlotte has been covering the story Marcus Hayes’ rejection as lead pastor of First Baptist Church in Naples, FL where he received only 81% of the required 85% vote to secure the position. In light of his rejection, several prominent and outspoken Southern Baptist leaders have accused that 19% of members who voted against Hayes of “racism” and “white supremacy.” In our first article, we predicted that these accusations were patently false, and our second post, we received corroborating evidence that the search committee had a history of corruption and possibly acted the same way this time.

Now, after being contacted by several members of the church who voted “no” to Hayes as lead pastor, Reformation Charlotte now has copies of the emails sent to members of the church by the concerned party prior to the vote that detail the concerns of these members — and these concerns are VERY legitimate.

A copy of the entire email will be posted below, however, I will summarize and highlight the concerns first.

First, the members who voted “no” had a major concern with Hayes being used primarily as a token. In the email sent to members by the concerned party, the question of Hayes qualifications was brought up. The email states,

Join Us and Get These Perks:

✅ No Ads in Articles
✅ Access to Comments and Discussions
✅ Community Chats
✅ Full Article and Podcast Archive
✅ The Joy of Supporting Our Work 😉



After talking with a member of the search committee we learned that the committee asked Marcus if he had a plan to bring about church reconciliation?  Their response was “Well, Pastor Marcus Hayes is in a bi-racial marriage so he is very acquainted with problem resolution”.  We were not sure how to take this answer but found it filled with racial overtones that had nothing to do with the nature of the conversation. 

It’s clear that the leadership of this church were more concerned about having a black man as pastor to signal some kind of virtue to the church and to the rest of the Southern Baptist Convention that they were somehow virtuous for having a black pastor, despite his qualifications, which they also mention.

In the email, it was said that Marcus Hayes began to block members of FBC Naples on social media PRIOR to the vote. He began to block them because they were raising questions about legitimate concerns. We’ll talk about those concerns next. But we must ask: what kind of pastor blocks members of his local congregation?

Turns out, Marcus Hayes is a pro-abortion pro-LGBTQ Democrat supporter, and a sizable number of the church’s membership was concerned about that, among other concerning things. According to FBC Naples leadership and the Southern Baptist Convention leadership, it’s “racist” to be concerned about that. Here’s what the email listed as concerns that should be asked of Marcus Hayes BEFORE the vote,

  • A tweet in positive support of pro-late term abortion, pro-LGBTQ Democrat, Kamala Harris,
  • His endorsement of Eric Mason’s “Woke Church” and concerns about his support of intersectionality, Critical Race Theory, and worldly vain philosophies,
  • His support for race-driven slave reparations,
  • Concerns about his plan for discipleship,
  • Concerns over his position and who he will be accountable to,
  • How he planned to bring reconciliation to the church body.

This email encouraged others to ask these questions at the pre-vote meeting. Just like Reformation Charlotte predicted, there is not a single thing in this email that points to racism or white supremacy as the reason for voting against him. In fact, he should have been rejected by 100% of the voting bloc and because he wasn’t, it’s actually clear that the 81% who voted “yes” to Hayes are actually the racists for judging Hayes by the color of his skin rather than by the content of his character — which happens to be ungodly.

Full email text below.

The Dissenter is primarily supported by its readers. The best way to support us is to subscribe to our members-only site where you will receive all of our content ad-free, plus you will get member-only exclusive content.

Or you can make a one-time or recurring donation using the box below. (Note, the donation box below is not for memberships, but for donations. For memberships, use the button above.) For all other donor or supporter inquiries, please reach out to jeff@disntr.com.

- Advertisement -

Latest

How Greg got Saved, BC Part One.

How Greg got Saved, BC Part One.

I’m not going to give my life story here, but a brief synopsis will lay the groundwork for what ultimately led to my receiving Christ in August of 1984. I enjoy other people’s salvation testimonies and thought somebody might be interested in mine. My mother was...

- Advertisement -

Subscribe

Store

Follow Us

- Advertisement -

You Might Also Like…

How Greg got Saved, BC Part Two

How Greg got Saved, BC Part Two

Last time I gave a quick overview of my early life and the circumstances leading up to my move at 16 to Arizona to live with my uncle. To pick up there, I took off from Detroit Metro at about 11pm and landed at Phoenix Sky Harbor a few hours later. I was filled with...

How Greg got Saved, BC Part One.

How Greg got Saved, BC Part One.

I’m not going to give my life story here, but a brief synopsis will lay the groundwork for what ultimately led to my receiving Christ in August of 1984. I enjoy other people’s salvation testimonies and thought somebody might be interested in mine. My mother was...

- Advertisement -

Want to go ad-free with exclusive content? Subscribe today.

This will close in 0 seconds