– Advertisement –

False Teacher of the Day #54: Tim Mackie, The Bible Project

by | Dec 29, 2022 | Apostasy, Blog, False Teacher of the Day, heresy, Opinion, Religion, The Church | 0 comments

💡We need your support. As big tech continues its crackdown on conservative blogs, our days on these platforms are numbered. Go Ad-Free plus get Exclusive Member-Only content by subscribing to us on Substack!

It is pertinent that we continue to warn Christians about the dangerous teachings of Tim Mackie, co-founder of the widely popular The Bible Project series on YouTube. In our previous article, we exposed Mackie’s denial of the biblical doctrine of Hell as a place of torment where the eternal wrath of God is poured out among those who reject Him. Rather, Mackie portrays Hell as a creation of man, a view that is clearly contradictory to the clear teaching of Scripture. It is imperative that believers stand firm on the truth of God’s Word and reject any teachings, like those of Mackie, that undermine it.

Tim Mackie recently participated in a conversation with the hosts of the Almost Heretical podcast to discuss his views on homosexuality, inerrancy, and other related topics.

One of the main points that Mackie emphasized is his belief that the Bible should not be “used as a weapon” to harm or discriminate against LGBTQ individuals. He stated, “If you have a view that is causing harm to people, you have a responsibility to change your view. If you have a view that is causing people to be suicidal, you have a responsibility to change your view.” During the conversation, Mackie discusses Jesus’s teachings on marriage and divorce, and how they relate to the narrative of the Bible. He argues that Jesus’s understanding of marriage is based on the divine ideal described in the first two chapters of Genesis, which involves a lifetime covenant between one man and one woman.

Unfortunately, rather than taking a stance against homosexuality and transgenderism based on a biblical perspective, Mackie urges others to consider the Bible’s claims about sexual morality in the context of contemporary scientific knowledge about biology and gender. “Because what usually happens is,” Mackie said, “the Bible is a divine rulebook dropped from heaven, here’s a verse taken out of context, and then whether intentionally or not, I end up using it as a weapon to reaffirm some kind of cultural or socioeconomic boundary line between me and them.”

“That’s usually how the Bible plays in these conversations, and I think Jesus would be really disappointed in His followers about that. So for me, it’s about how does the narrative work, what are the claims of the narrative, and how does that engage the best of what we know about gender and biology today?”

Rather than firmly supporting the authority of the Bible, Mackie attempted to address the issue of inerrancy but argued that the term “inerrancy” is not useful for understanding it. This not only reveals a lack of trust in the ability of a Holy and Righteous, omnipotent, and sovereign God to clearly and accurately communicate with His people, but it also outright rejects the historic doctrine of verbal plenary inspiration. He explained that the concept of inerrancy, which refers to the belief that the Bible is completely free from error, is a modern construct that is not representative of how the biblical authors themselves viewed the scriptures. Instead, he suggests that the Bible does contain errors.

“Inerrancy is a more modern word connected to that thing we talked about earlier about the painting of the pipe,” Mackie said. “Does the painting refer to the real thing in a way in which there is no errors in that reference process? And I’d join the ranks of those who find the word inerrancy to be setting up the conversation in not just an unhelpful way, but just a really odd way.”

Instead, Mackie prefers to use the “biblical vocabulary of faithfulness,” which he believes better captures the idea that the Bible faithfully represents God’s will to His people. The doctrine of inerrancy is at the heart of theological conservatism, and abandoning it opens the door to heresy, including a lax approach to sexual immorality and other sins. It is vital to uphold the doctrine of inerrancy in order to defend against such deviations from the truth. Mackie’s position is classic theological liberalism.

Join Us and Get These Perks:

✅ No Ads in Articles
✅ Access to Comments and Discussions
✅ Community Chats
✅ Full Article and Podcast Archive
✅ The Joy of Supporting Our Work 😉

However, Mackie’s views on the atonement are even more problematic. In one sermon, he made at least two outlandish statements ridiculing the conservative, biblical doctrine the atonement and penal substitution. In the video posted at the end of this article, you can hear Mackie’s remarks at the following timestamps:

Tim Mackie states (4:01 in the video), “And then we bring Jesus into it. And what we end up with is a story that God’s perfect, he’s holy and he’s perfect. You’re not, so God has to kill you. He’s to kill you. He needs his pound of flesh.”

Then, Mackie states (4:42 in the video), “…in the name of His justice and so he, he’s gonna kill you because he’s angry at you. But instead, he’s gonna kill Jesus. And he takes out his anger on Jesus and then he allows you, after you die, to go to the good place and not the bad place. So you can sing forever the praises of the God who didn’t kill you.”

Tim Mackie’s comments about the atonement conflict with the biblical doctrine of penal substitution and imputation because they present a distorted and incomplete understanding of the purpose and significance of Jesus’s sacrifice on the cross. According to Romans 5:8, “God shows his love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us.” The atonement is not about God requiring someone’s death in order to satisfy his sense of justice or to vent his anger. Rather, it is about God offering a way for people to be reconciled to him and receive forgiveness for their sins through the death and resurrection of Jesus.

This belief is rooted in the understanding that Jesus, as the Son of God, is fully divine and fully human, and that his death on the cross was a voluntary and substitutionary sacrifice that fulfilled the requirements of God’s justice and demonstrated his love and grace towards humanity. According to Colossians 1:20, “and through him to reconcile to himself all things, whether on earth or in heaven, making peace by the blood of his cross.” Mackie’s portrayal of the atonement as a transaction in which God takes out his anger on Jesus and then allows people to go to a good place after they die is a mockery of Jesus’s sacrifice on the cross and does not accurately reflect the biblical doctrine of the atonement.

Overall, Tim Mackie has consistently demonstrated a lack of understanding and respect for the Bible and its teachings, particularly in regards to the doctrine of the atonement. He has distorted and minimized the significance of Jesus’s sacrifice on the cross, which is one of the most central and fundamental teachings of Christianity.

In light of this, it is necessary for believers to take the warning of 2 Timothy 3:16 seriously: “All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness.” Those who disregard or misinterpret the Bible, such as Mackie, should be marked and avoided in order to protect the integrity and authority of God’s Word.

17 I appeal to you, brothers, to watch out for those who cause divisions and create obstacles contrary to the doctrine that you have been taught; avoid them. 18 For such persons do not serve our Lord Christ, but their own appetites, and by smooth talk and flattery they deceive the hearts of the naive. —Romans 16:17

The Dissenter is primarily supported by its readers. The best way to support us is to subscribe to our members-only site where you will receive all of our content ad-free, plus you will get member-only exclusive content.

Or you can make a one-time or recurring donation using the box below. (Note, the donation box below is not for memberships, but for donations. For memberships, use the button above.) For all other donor or supporter inquiries, please reach out to jeff@disntr.com.

- Advertisement -


No, Abortion is Not a “States’ Rights Issue,” Here’s Why

No, Abortion is Not a “States’ Rights Issue,” Here’s Why

In the aftermath of the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, a chorus of celebration erupted from the conservative corner of America. The triumph was substantial, the cries of victory deafening. Republican leaders and right-wing pundits proudly declared...

- Advertisement -



Follow Us

- Advertisement -

You Might Also Like…

Peace and Unity With the Left is Not an Option for Christians

Peace and Unity With the Left is Not an Option for Christians

In the aftermath of the recent assassination attempt on Donald Trump, it may seem prudent to seek common ground with our enemies. It may be easy to fall prey to the superficial and hollow calls to “unity” from political leaders—whether it be Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi,...

Responding to the Modern Idols of the World: Self-Esteem

Responding to the Modern Idols of the World: Self-Esteem

Continuing our series on confronting modern idols, today I'm going to talk about the idol of self-esteem. Seemingly subtle, it towers above all else. The focus on "me, myself, and I," it's a mantra instilled in us even in the very curriculum of elementary school. It's...

US Army Labels Pro-life Groups as Terrorist Organizations

US Army Labels Pro-life Groups as Terrorist Organizations

According to reports online, an anti-terrorism brief held at Fort Liberty (formerly Fort Bragg) has crossed a line that should infuriate any reasonable person. The presentation allegedly labeled several pro-life organizations, like National Right to Life and Operation...

- Advertisement -

Want to go ad-free with exclusive content? Subscribe today.

This will close in 0 seconds