โ€“ Advertisement โ€“

The Cancer of Effeminate Worship in the Modern Church

by | Feb 25, 2025 | News

The lights dim. A soft purple haze spreads across the stage, a carefully manufactured mist rising from hidden fog machines like some mystical veil between heaven and earth. The lead singer, a guy with the vocal timbre of a teenage boy penning poetry in his journal, breathes into the microphone, eyes closed, hand outstretched in longing.

โ€œTake me back to the garden, lead me back to the moment I saw Your face,โ€ he croons.

The melody drips with sentiment, a love song aching for a cosmic embrace. In the crowd, hands sway, heads tilt, and a soft, collective sigh rises. This isnโ€™t the Church worshiping the Ancient of Daysโ€”this is an Emily Henry novel set to music.

Somewhere in the pews, an honest man shifts uncomfortably. He came here to worship the risen Christ, the King of Kings, the Alpha and Omega. Instead, heโ€™s surrounded by a congregation murmuring syrupy lyrics about how โ€œeasyโ€ Jesus is to love, how Heโ€™s โ€œcloser than my skin,โ€ how His presence โ€œfeels so good.โ€

It doesnโ€™t feel like churchโ€”it feels like a junior high dance, complete with ambient lighting and emotionally charged whisper-singing. And yet, week after week, the masses lap it up, never questioning why the worship of an all-powerful God has been reduced to something that could easily be mistaken for a prom ballad.

Join Us and Get These Perks:

โœ… No Ads in Articles
โœ… Access to Comments and Discussions
โœ… Community Chats
โœ… Full Article and Podcast Archive
โœ… The Joy of Supporting Our Work ๐Ÿ˜‰



How did we get here? How did Christian worship, once defined by deep theological truths, by men singing boldly of Godโ€™s sovereignty, become a production that barely differs from a Taylor Swift concert?

It wasnโ€™t overnight.

This descent into this effeminate style of worship was slow, methodical, and lucrative. It began with the sentimentalism of the Jesus Movement in the 60s and 70s, where good theology took a backseat to feelings. Then came the worship industrial complex, now dominated by bands like Hillsong, Bethel, and Elevation Worshipโ€”organizations that realized there was real money to be made in turning worship into a brand rather than a biblical act of reverence.

And boy, does it sell. The business model is brilliant โ€ฆ take a catchy, repetitive hook, inject vague language about longing and closeness, and wrap it all up in a glossy, highly produced sound thatโ€™s easy to replicate.

Churches across the country gobble it up, unaware (or maybe they are aware) that theyโ€™re not participating in worship but in a billion-dollar industry. Licensing royalties, concert tickets, album salesโ€”all driven by music that is scarcely distinguishable from secular love songs.

The congregation, meanwhile, loves it. Why? Because they donโ€™t worship Christโ€”they worship their own emotions. They come to church not to glorify God but to chase an experience, a rush, an atmosphere. When they close their eyes and sway, they arenโ€™t contemplating the weight of Christโ€™s sacrifice, theyโ€™re indulging in the mood of the moment.

Most people have been conditioned to believe that true worship must feel intimate, that unless they feel personally swept into a dreamy spiritual embrace, they havenโ€™t โ€œexperiencedโ€ God.

The most glaring reality in all of this is that this movement is powered by women. Walk into any Southern Baptist church today and who is leading the worship? More often than not, itโ€™s women, standing center stage, hands lifted, voices ornamented with dramatic vibratos and breathy embellishments.

And the men? Silent. Passive. Watching.

The role of leading worship, biblically and historically tied to men charged with leading the congregation in doctrine and truth, has been handed over to those who are neither called nor commanded to lead in this capacity. But who cares about biblical order when the show feels so good?

Itโ€™s not that women shouldnโ€™t sing or be part of the choirโ€”they should. But no, they are there to perform, to command attention, to turn worship into a spectacle of themselves. The runs, the dramatic pauses, the solosโ€”they arenโ€™t inviting people to lift their voices in unity. They are centering themselves as the focal point of worship, inserting themselves between the congregation and the One they claim to be exalting.

And again, the menโ€”effeminate, spiritually castratedโ€”nod along, unwilling to lead, unwilling to challenge, unwilling to restore order.

Even the men who do lead the singing are hardly men at all. They have adopted the soft, emotional delivery of their female counterparts, raising their voices to unnatural falsettos, breathlessly whispering sweet nothings about Jesus as though He were their high school crush.

Their voices quiver, their eyes well with the slightest effort, and their hands clutch the microphone with a desperation that would make even the sappiest boy-band frontman wince. Instead of leading in strength, they lead in fragility, as though worship requires a carefully curated emotional breakdown rather than a bold proclamation of Godโ€™s glory.

Michael W. Smith, Matt Maher, Hillsongโ€™s endless rotation of male sopranosโ€”they all seem to have misconstrued worship for a competition in who can sound the most emotionally fragile. Each performance feels like an audition for the role of the heartbroken lover, crooning into the abyss, waiting for an answer that never comes.

Their voices do not carry the weight of truth but the delicate, feathery ache of someone penning a diary entry about their most recent heartbreak. No bass. No boldness. No strength. Just a parade of weak, trembling voices, desperately clinging to every syllable like a poet reciting love letters under the pale moonlight.

This is nothing more than theatricsโ€”a lyrical ballet of men wearing tights too tight and prancing around on stage.

And the congregation follows along, mimicking the sentimentality, equating vulnerability with holiness, and letting themselves be led by men who sound like they might burst into tears at any moment.

And in this sea of passivity, the true purpose of worship is drowned out. Gone are the days when the congregation lifted their voices in robust, doctrinally sound hymns, where men sang with the confidence of warriors declaring allegiance to their King.

Now, the voices are lost beneath waves of instrumentationโ€”drums, electric guitars, overproduced synth pads that smother the congregation rather than support it. The point of worship is no longer the collective voices of the saints praising the Lord in unisonโ€”itโ€™s the performance of the band, the manipulation of the atmosphere.

Even the very act of corporate singing has been eroded. Worship, according to Scripture, is meant to be together. The voices of the saints, men and women alike, rising in unison to glorify God (Acts 4:24, Psalm 34:3).

But when worship becomes entertainment, when the songs are designed for performance rather than participation, the congregation ceases to be a part of it. They watch. They sway. They close their eyes and let the show unfold. Worship has been stolen from the peopleโ€”and ultimately, stolen from Godโ€”and handed to the professionals.

Effeminate worship is not a mere nuisanceโ€”it is a cancer. It has softened men, elevated women beyond their biblical roles, and turned the exaltation of God into a self-indulgent emotional high.

It has taken the glory of Christ and reshaped it into something marketable, profitable, and utterly pathetic. And the worst part? The men let it happen. They refused to lead. They refused to guard the sanctity of worship. They allowed their churches to be feminized, their voices to be drowned out, their leadership to be usurped.

And so the church sways, eyes closed, hands raised, whispering about how โ€œeasyโ€ Jesus is to love. And He is watching. And He is not pleased.

Three Ways to Support DISNTR


The Dissenter is primarily supported by its readers. The best way to support us is to subscribe to our members-only Substack site where you will receive all of our content ad-free, plus you will get member-only exclusive content.

Support us with a monthly donation on Patreon

Support us with membership to our ad-free Substack

Make one-time or monthly donation on Donorbox


๐Ÿ‘• Or make a purchase from our online store. ๐Ÿ‘•
Make a Dogecoin Donation

- Advertisement -

Latest

Dear Effeminate Pastor, Hereโ€™s Why Youโ€™re Bleeding Men

Dear Effeminate Pastor, Hereโ€™s Why Youโ€™re Bleeding Men

Dear Effeminate Pastor, You stand on a stage, not a pulpit. Beneath theatrical lights, not the burning fire of truth. Draped in pastel rebellion and accessorized like a department store mannequin on discount, you glide across the platform like a self-help seminar host...

Preparing Your Children for the Next Sexual Revolution, Part III

Preparing Your Children for the Next Sexual Revolution, Part III

In Part I of this series, we traced the roots of the modern sexual revolution, showing how it has marched steadily from fornication to pride parades and beyond, fueled by cultural apathy and theological cowardice. In Part II, we exposed the metastasizing nature of...

The Gospel According to Karl Marx

The Gospel According to Karl Marx

Karl Marx was not just some economist scribbling theories in obscurity who happened to have a stroke of luck in becoming a household nameโ€”he was the architect of a worldview that treats envy as virtue, revolution as redemption, and the State as god. What began in the...

If Evangelicals Want to Become Catholic, We Should Let Them Go

If Evangelicals Want to Become Catholic, We Should Let Them Go

Let them go. Really, let them. If your spiritual appetite can be satisfied by the incense-choked pageantry of Romeโ€”by genuflecting before a golden cage of transubstantiated flourโ€”then it was never Christ that you hungered for to begin with. If you're willing to trade...

- Advertisement -

Subscribe

Store

Follow Us

- Advertisement -

- Advertisement -

You Might Also Likeโ€ฆ

The Gospel According to Karl Marx

The Gospel According to Karl Marx

Karl Marx was not just some economist scribbling theories in obscurity who happened to have a stroke of luck in becoming a household nameโ€”he was the architect of a worldview that treats envy as virtue, revolution as redemption, and the State as god. What began in the...

If Evangelicals Want to Become Catholic, We Should Let Them Go

If Evangelicals Want to Become Catholic, We Should Let Them Go

Let them go. Really, let them. If your spiritual appetite can be satisfied by the incense-choked pageantry of Romeโ€”by genuflecting before a golden cage of transubstantiated flourโ€”then it was never Christ that you hungered for to begin with. If you're willing to trade...

The Teen Who Waited Too Long to Murder Her Child is Sentenced

The Teen Who Waited Too Long to Murder Her Child is Sentenced

In a Nebraska courtroom, justice was finally dispensedโ€”but not in the way most would assume. Chloe Coplen-Anderson, now 18, was sentenced to 35 to 60 years in prison after being convicted of slitting her newborn sonโ€™s throat shortly after giving birth in her bedroom....

Anti-Trinitarian Heretic, TD Jakes is Stepping Down

Anti-Trinitarian Heretic, TD Jakes is Stepping Down

At long last, the velvet-tongued emperor of Christian celebrity culture, Bishop T.D. Jakes, has announced his exit from the pulpit of The Potterโ€™s Houseโ€”the crumbling empire he built atop the rotting carcass of the Word of Faith movement and anti-Trinitarian heresy....

- Advertisement -

 

Want to go ad-free with exclusive content? Subscribe today.
Already a subscriber? Click Here

Three Ways to Support DISNTR



The Dissenter is primarily supported by its readers. The best way to support us is to subscribe to our members-only Substack site where you will receive all of our content ad-free, plus you will get member-only exclusive content.

 

Support us with a monthly donation on Patreon

Support us with membership to our ad-free Substack

Make one-time or monthly donation on Donorbox


๐Ÿ‘• Or make a purchase from our online store. ๐Ÿ‘•