In the case of David Bloch, a snowboarding coach at Woodstock Union High School in Vermont, we see a textbook example of discrimination fueled by today’s cultural and political biases. Bloch, who not only founded the school’s snowboarding team but also spearheaded its success since 2011, was unceremoniously fired. The trigger for this unjust dismissal? A mere casual conversation with two students, during which Bloch stated the obvious: that there are inherent biological differences between males and females, particularly in the realm of sports.

The details of this conversation reveal the absurdity of the opposition to Bloch’s remarks. He merely pointed out the well-documented and scientifically supported fact that men and women, on average, have different physical capabilities due to biological differences. This is not a controversial or radical statement—it is a basic acknowledgment of human physiology and has significant implications in the world of sports. In most athletic contexts, these differences give males a physical advantage over females, an observation backed by countless studies and empirical evidence.

The conversation between Bloch and these two students wasn’t a formal lecture or a public statement representing the school, it was a private discussion, not meant for a wider audience. Bloch wasn’t addressing the school or even his entire team. It was a brief, three-minute exchange that should have been inconsequential. Yet, this exchange cost him his job​​. Ironically, one of the two students involved in the conversation even supported the idea that Bloch should be reinstated, which was documented in federal court records​​.

This situation represents a glaring example of the double standards and hypocrisy in the current social and educational milieu. If Bloch had given a talk affirming abortion, counseling these students to pursue “gender-affirming” surgery, or advocating for some other leftist cause, you know as well as I do that his job would have remained secure. But he wasn’t toeing the line of political correctness, he was speaking the truth.

Yet, in today’s hyper-sensitive and politically charged environment, such straightforward statements are treated as radical or offensive. The opposition to Bloch’s remarks is rooted in ideological dogma, not logic, reason, or scientific reality. It’s a clear indication of how far leftists are willing to go to deny basic truths in favor of maintaining a narrative that aligns with their agenda. This situation goes beyond a simple disagreement or debate over perspectives. It represents a disturbing trend where factual, scientifically supported observations are dismissed and penalized if they don’t conform to certain ideological views.

Bloch’s mere acknowledgment of biological realities has been twisted and construed as some form of bigotry, a move that is as absurd as it is dangerous. It’s an illustration of how far the scales are tipped in favor of leftist ideology. In today’s society, it’s not just acceptable but celebrated to promote views that align with progressive narratives, no matter how controversial or unscientific they may be. However, the moment someone dares to express a conservative or Christian viewpoint, particularly one grounded in biological fact or conservative, Christian morality, they are viciously attacked, labeled as a purveyor of “hate speech,” and often face severe repercussions.

This then leads to the question: Who gets to decide what is classified as dangerous or hateful speech? The answer, of course, is clear—it is the leftists who claim this authority because they can. They have taken it upon themselves to be the arbiters of truth, the gatekeepers of morality, blatantly disregarding the fundamental tenets of free speech and open debate. Their tactics are not those of reasoned argument or respectful disagreement, rather, they resort to censorship, character assassination, and outright bullying to silence any opposition.

Leftists do not play by the rules of balanced discourse. Instead, they wield their power to suppress any ideology that contradicts their narrative, especially those rooted in Christianity or conservative values. This overreach is more than just a threat to individuals like David Bloch; it’s a threat to the very fabric of our society, undermining the foundational freedoms upon which our nation was built.

This case not only sheds light on the current state of freedom of speech and religious expression but also raises significant concerns about the future of these fundamental rights. If expressing a view based on biological reality and potentially informed by religious beliefs can lead to such severe consequences, it prompts serious reflection on where society is headed in terms of tolerating diverse viewpoints and upholding constitutional freedoms. The dismissal of David Bloch is not just about a coach losing his job; it’s emblematic of a larger cultural and political battle over freedom of speech, religious liberty, and the right to hold and express views that may not align with the prevailing progressive ideology.