– Advertisement –

Top SBC Leader Urges Churches to Accept Government Wealth Redistribution Funding, Theft

by | Apr 3, 2020 | News, Politics, Social Justice, Social-Issues, The Church | 0 comments

💡We need your support. As big tech continues its crackdown on conservative blogs, our days on these platforms are numbered. Go Ad-Free plus get Exclusive Member-Only content by subscribing to us on Substack!

The separation of Church and State has been a key concept in the history of the United States as churches and religious organizations have the right to operate freely without any form of coercion from any governing body. Churches are free to preach the Scriptures and operate how they sit fit according to their religious beliefs despite the fact that the majority of the world objects.

One way, however, that the government has been able to slap restrictions on the way churches and religious organizations operate is through government funding. In recent years, we’ve seen this through government grants to private Christian schools, for example. If church-operated Christian schools accept any government funding or grants, it’s usually in the form of an agreement to operate a certain way — for example, not being allowed to “discriminate” against homosexuals.

During the coronavirus outbreak, the CARES act allows churches and other religious organizations to accept government bail-out funds to keep their church operations afloat during the economic shutdown. While the funding is pitched as a “loan,” the president and other leaders have repeatedly stated that the loans are 100 percent forgivable on the first day that the first payments are due so long as employees are kept on the payroll. This goes for both small businesses and religious organizations.

Despite the semantics, this is not a loan, but clearly a conditional grant. And so long as the entire economy does not completely collapse the world into permanent chaos, the conditions aren’t that difficult to meat if the “loan” is taken.

Join Us and Get These Perks:

✅ No Ads in Articles
✅ Access to Comments and Discussions
✅ Community Chats
✅ Full Article and Podcast Archive
✅ The Joy of Supporting Our Work 😉

But top Southern Baptist leader, Russell Moore of the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission (ERLC) is playing this semantic game and urging churches to consider taking the bailout funds from the government. He writes in an article titled Do SBA-backed loans violate the separation of church and state?:

I have warned churches not to accept such funds, even where they can legally do so, because government funding brings with it, in the fullness of time, government control. I stand by all of that. 

That said, what we see, so far, in this situation is not, in my view, government funding of churches or religions or ministries. The government, in this case, recognizes the precarious state of the economy and is seeking to get ahead of possible defaults and foreclosures and skyrocketing unemployment.

. . .

Some church leaders are uneasy with the fact that some of these loans may turn out to be forgivable. Again, though, this is not government funding. It would be, of course, if the SBA declared that, say, loans would be forgivable for churches and not for other similar bodies, but that is not the case. 

He then goes on to try to convince you that the government has the best interest of churches at heart and that there is no danger whatsoever of government taking this opportunity to exert force over religious organizations.

Some are concerned that were they to take out SBA-backed loans, especially if they turn out to be forgivable, that this will invite the government in to dictate their ministries or policies. We have no indication that such would be the case, and, were any future governing authority to seek retroactively to restrict the First Amendment on such grounds, I believe such a move would be successfully repudiated in court.

Maybe not under the current presidency, that’s true. But the precedent set here is irresponsible for any Christian leader. Moore must know that the government has repeatedly tried to stifle the First Amendment rights of churches and individuals for centuries and will stop at nothing to achieve that goal. Not only is it dangerous from a civil and legal perspective for churches to accept government bailouts, it’s morally reprehensible. If taxpayers paid for it, then taxpayers own it — and churches are stealing money from taxpayers. It’s called redistribution and the Scriptures call it theft.

The Dissenter is primarily supported by its readers. The best way to support us is to subscribe to our members-only site where you will receive all of our content ad-free, plus you will get member-only exclusive content.

Or you can make a one-time or recurring donation using the box below. (Note, the donation box below is not for memberships, but for donations. For memberships, use the button above.) For all other donor or supporter inquiries, please reach out to jeff@disntr.com.

- Advertisement -


No, Abortion is Not a “States’ Rights Issue,” Here’s Why

No, Abortion is Not a “States’ Rights Issue,” Here’s Why

In the aftermath of the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, a chorus of celebration erupted from the conservative corner of America. The triumph was substantial, the cries of victory deafening. Republican leaders and right-wing pundits proudly declared...

- Advertisement -



Follow Us

- Advertisement -

You Might Also Like…

Peace and Unity With the Left is Not an Option for Christians

Peace and Unity With the Left is Not an Option for Christians

In the aftermath of the recent assassination attempt on Donald Trump, it may seem prudent to seek common ground with our enemies. It may be easy to fall prey to the superficial and hollow calls to “unity” from political leaders—whether it be Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi,...

- Advertisement -

Want to go ad-free with exclusive content? Subscribe today.

This will close in 0 seconds