– Advertisement –

The Logical Conclusion to Preston Sprinkle’s Views on Same Sex Attracted is Pure Blasphemy

by | Jun 3, 2025 | News, Opinion, Religion

✪ Read this article ad-free and leave comments here on Substack

In a recent webinar podcast geared toward making the argument that same sex attraction is not sinful, Preston Sprinkle and Gregory Coles suggest that Jesus Himself may have experienced sexual attraction. Coles states, “It does seem like it sort of cheapens the passage to be like, Jesus totally knows what you’re going through, but not that part… Jesus didn’t deal with that part.”

Sprinkle agrees, as they speculated that, since God created humans as sexual beings, “the thing we call opposite-sex attraction is kind of just part of being human.” Their claim is simply that if Jesus was fully human, and sexuality is part of humanity, then Jesus probably experienced sexual attraction.

But here’s the thing—both men also spent the entire podcast arguing that same-sex attraction isn’t sinful. It’s just a natural consequence of the fall. So if sexual attraction isn’t sin, and Jesus experienced sexual attraction, then what exactly stops them from making the logical jump that Jesus could have been same-sex attracted?

This is the absurd end of their logic. Did they make this claim? No. But, please, pay attention. Because it’s the next logical step. I’m pointing out that there is no logical reason to reject such a claim IF you hold their views, and this is why we cannot cede one inch to them.

Join Us and Get These Perks:

✅ No Ads in Articles
✅ Access to Comments and Discussions
✅ Community Chats
✅ Full Article and Podcast Archive
✅ The Joy of Supporting Our Work 😉



Here is the logic:

If same-sex attraction isn’t sinful, then Jesus could have had it and still remained sinless.

That’s the garbage you get when you redefine sin as a mere behavioral glitch instead of the inward corruption of the heart.

If same sex attraction is “just a result of the fall,” but not sin itself, then what’s stopping anyone from dragging Christ into the same muck and calling it empathy? According to them, Jesus can relate to your temptations, so long as you don’t call those temptations sinful. It’s blasphemy.

But Scripture isn’t vague. Jesus was tempted in every way except sin (Hebrews 4:15). He bore the consequences of the fall—hunger, pain, grief—but not its corruption. He didn’t inherit our disordered affections. He didn’t entertain inward rebellion. And He certainly didn’t carry around sexual inclinations that violate God’s design.

James 1 is clear that temptation arises from desire, and desire gives birth to sin. The very thing these men excuse is what Christ came to destroy—not embrace. Jesus isn’t your gay friend who gets it. He’s the spotless Lamb, undefiled, holy, and righteous. And anyone dragging His name through their rainbow-colored theology ought to tremble.

Three Ways to Support DISNTR


The Dissenter is primarily supported by its readers. The best way to support us is to subscribe to our members-only Substack site where you will receive all of our content ad-free, plus you will get member-only exclusive content.

Support us with a monthly donation on Patreon

Support us with membership to our ad-free Substack

Make one-time or monthly donation on Donorbox


👕 Or make a purchase from our online store. 👕
Make a Dogecoin Donation

- Advertisement -

Latest

That Moment When Paula “Jezebel” White Compared Trump to Christ

That Moment When Paula “Jezebel” White Compared Trump to Christ

I thought I had heard it all. I really did. Paula White has spent years building a reputation as one of the most brazen purveyors of prosperity nonsense in modern evangelicalism—name it, claim it, decree it, declare it, speak it into existence. The whole tired script....

How the Church Failed at Dismantling the Transgender Movement

How the Church Failed at Dismantling the Transgender Movement

For years now, the modern transgender movement hasn’t operated like a loose collection of ideas. It’s functioned like a system—predictable, coordinated, and disturbingly efficient. Not chaos. Not confusion. A process. A conveyor belt—the transgender conveyor belt—as...

In a World Unraveling, God Still Reigns.

In a World Unraveling, God Still Reigns.

I wake up, grab my coffee, thumb the screen—and it’s the same grim parade, again. A man guns down a pregnant woman at a red light—her husband beside her—an unborn child erased in the same breath, and the system shrugs it off under the banner of insanity. Not...

The Modern American Soft “Jesus” is an Idol

The Modern American Soft “Jesus” is an Idol

The modern American imagination is an idol factory, and it has manufactured a version of Jesus that never existed. In this version, Jesus is soft-spoken, endlessly agreeable, and almost allergic to confrontation. He floats through the Gospels like a spiritual...

- Advertisement -

Subscribe

Store

Follow Us

- Advertisement -

- Advertisement -

You Might Also Like…

How the Church Failed at Dismantling the Transgender Movement

How the Church Failed at Dismantling the Transgender Movement

For years now, the modern transgender movement hasn’t operated like a loose collection of ideas. It’s functioned like a system—predictable, coordinated, and disturbingly efficient. Not chaos. Not confusion. A process. A conveyor belt—the transgender conveyor belt—as...

In a World Unraveling, God Still Reigns.

In a World Unraveling, God Still Reigns.

I wake up, grab my coffee, thumb the screen—and it’s the same grim parade, again. A man guns down a pregnant woman at a red light—her husband beside her—an unborn child erased in the same breath, and the system shrugs it off under the banner of insanity. Not...

The Modern American Soft “Jesus” is an Idol

The Modern American Soft “Jesus” is an Idol

The modern American imagination is an idol factory, and it has manufactured a version of Jesus that never existed. In this version, Jesus is soft-spoken, endlessly agreeable, and almost allergic to confrontation. He floats through the Gospels like a spiritual...

Liberals and Conservatives are Not “Equal But Opposite” Evils

Liberals and Conservatives are Not “Equal But Opposite” Evils

“Yes, Democrats are evil, but Republicans…” I always hear the David French types, the Phil Vischer types, the JD Greear types, attempt to argue that Republicans are some kind of “opposite” evil from Democrats. These center-leftists, for lack of a better term, will...

- Advertisement -

Want to go ad-free with exclusive content? Subscribe today.
Already a subscriber? Click Here

This will close in 0 seconds

Three Ways to Support DISNTR



The Dissenter is primarily supported by its readers. The best way to support us is to subscribe to our members-only Substack site where you will receive all of our content ad-free, plus you will get member-only exclusive content.

 

Support us with a monthly donation on Patreon

Support us with membership to our ad-free Substack

Make one-time or monthly donation on Donorbox


👕 Or make a purchase from our online store. 👕

This will close in 0 seconds