Picture this, a quaint Mennonite church, where one might expect sermons on humility, simplicity, and the steadfastness of God. Instead, we’re treated to a peculiar display—a ladypastrix, adorned with a rainbow bracelet, sitting cross-legged in front of a group of wide-eyed children, spinning a tale about Noah’s ark.

But this isn’t your typical Sunday school lesson—oh no. This is progressive sexual indoctrination in full bloom, where even biblical symbols are twisted into something that would make even Balaam’s donkey do a double-take.

This Mennonite ladypastrix, a self-identified queer woman, decided it was time the kids learned that the rainbow God gave as a symbol of mercy after a world-destroying flood actually stands for something entirely different—LGBTQ inclusion.

Yes, according to her, the same symbol that marked God’s covenant now decorates the doors of the church as a sign of affirmation for all sexual identities. Who knew Noah was so progressive?

Watch:

As she beamed with self-satisfaction, telling the children that the rainbow is more than just a reminder of God’s promise, you could almost hear the sound of biblical integrity being shoved into the paper shredder in the background. She proudly explained that those rainbow stickers on the church doors aren’t just colorful decorations—they’re declarations that this church embraces those who identify as sexual deviants.

The message was clear: If you’re not on board with this new gospel of affirmation, you must be some kind of archaic, unloving relic.

It’s not enough to just teach children about God’s faithfulness, apparently. Instead, we must repurpose ancient symbols to fit modern ideologies. Why stop at the rainbow? Maybe next week they’ll explain that the parting of the Red Sea was a metaphor for breaking down gender norms. Or that the Tower of Babel was a failed attempt at multicultural harmony.

But it doesn’t stop there. This wasn’t just a lesson on rainbows. This was a self-congratulatory moment of indoctrination where the ladypastrix made sure to mention her own sexual identity, as if a group of children needed that bit of personal disclosure. Why? Because it’s not just about the message, it’s about the messenger. The goal wasn’t to teach biblical truth—it was to normalize her lifestyle under the guise of love and inclusion.

And it isn’t about love or inclusion either—it’s about control. Control the narrative. Control the symbols. Control the next generation’s understanding of truth. By blending the biblical with the ideological, she’s essentially saying that God must conform to her preferences. The irony is palpable… twisting God’s covenant symbol into a badge of rebellion and calling it holy.

And the saddest part? Those kids are being taught not to see the difference. They’re being led to believe that affirming sin is synonymous with showing love. They’re being told that truth bends to feelings. And they’re being handed a rainbow not as a promise of God’s mercy, but as a flag of ideological conquest.

As far as I see it, the millstones are out there waiting for her.