– Advertisement –

No, Amber Thurman Was Not a Victim of the Pro-Life Movement

by | Sep 23, 2024 | News, Opinion

✪ Read this article ad-free and leave comments here on Substack

The media in partnership with the pro-abortion lobby is at it again—twisting reality to paint 28-year-old Amber Thurman as yet another tragic victim of pro-life laws. If you’re unfamiliar with the story, Thurman chose to end the lives of her unborn twins after learning she was pregnant, seeking an abortion outside of Georgia due to the state’s laws. She took abortion pills that resulted in a rare deadly infection, which caused her death.

They would have you believe that she’s a martyr in the battle for so-called “reproductive rights,” whose life was senselessly lost due to a lack of “timely access to abortion care.” But let’s peel back the layers of deceit in this narrative. Thurman wasn’t victimized by the pro-life movement or by restrictive laws. No, she victimized her own children—two defenseless babies—and in doing so, brought about her own death.

The true story, stripped of all the self-righteous pro-abortion propaganda, is chillingly simple. Amber Thurman, a mother of one, became pregnant with twins in 2022. Instead of nurturing those lives—her own flesh and blood—she chose to snuff them out.

Why?

Because she didn’t want the responsibility. Because they were inconvenient. She made her choice, not because her life was in danger, but because, as the media likes to put it, she wanted to maintain her “stability.” She wanted to continue with her plans of enrolling in nursing school and living independently. But stability built on the graves of innocent children is no stability at all.

After Georgia’s heartbeat law prevented her from getting a surgical abortion past six weeks, Thurman took the deadly route of self-medicating, swallowing abortion pills to chemically end the lives of her twins.

The pills worked as expected—after all, they’re designed to kill—but they didn’t kill cleanly. An incomplete abortion meant that not all of the fetal tissue was expelled from her body. Her body, no longer the safe haven it should have been for her children, now became a battlefield of infection and decay.

Join Us and Get These Perks:

✅ No Ads in Articles
✅ Access to Comments and Discussions
✅ Community Chats
✅ Full Article and Podcast Archive
✅ The Joy of Supporting Our Work 😉



Sepsis set in—a horrifying consequence of murder gone wrong. And yet, the pro-abortion narrative insists that the real problem was not the abortion itself, but the fact that she couldn’t receive immediate medical intervention.

They argue that restrictive laws created “confusion” among hospital staff, delaying the necessary procedure to save her life. But let’s be clear, Thurman didn’t need a D&C because she was a victim of miscarriage or medical emergency—she needed it because she initiated the sequence of events that led to her own demise. She chose death for her children, and in the end, death came for her too.

This wasn’t some tragic accident or case of medical neglect. It was the natural consequence of a culture that teaches women that killing their children is a “right.” Thurman’s death wasn’t the fault of Georgia’s pro-life laws, it was the result of her own decision to prioritize personal convenience over the lives of her twins. Her children didn’t get to walk out of that hospital—why should we pretend that Thurman’s death is the only one that matters?

For twenty hours, she lay in that hospital bed, her condition worsening by the minute. Her family weeps over her suffering, but where are the tears for the two lives she destroyed before stepping foot into that hospital? The medical staff delayed performing a D&C because they were legally bound not to perform abortions.

But let’s not confuse this with victimhood. The only true victims in this entire tragedy are the twin babies who were denied the chance to live—poisoned to death in the name of “choice.” Oh, and her six-year-old son she left behind.

So, no, Amber Thurman is not a martyr. She’s not the tragic face of pro-life legislation gone wrong. She’s the grim reminder of what happens when we turn away from God’s design for life and embrace a culture of death. The media may want to portray her as some kind of hero—someone who died because of the big, bad pro-life laws. But that’s not the truth. The truth is, Thurman is the perpetrator, and her children—the innocent lives extinguished before they ever drew breath—are the only actual victims mourning in this.

What’s ironic in all this is the absolute moral incoherence of the pro-abortion movement. They cry about women’s rights and bodily autonomy, but ignore the fact that abortion robs the most vulnerable—those still in the womb—of any rights at all.

They’re quick to weaponize Thurman’s death, as if it’s somehow an indictment of pro-life laws, when in reality, it’s an indictment of their own ideology. If abortion wasn’t sold as a quick fix for life’s inconveniences, maybe Thurman would still be alive today. And more importantly, so would her children.

We can’t and won’t celebrate Thurman’s death. But neither can we pretend that she was an innocent victim in all of this. The real tragedy is not that she died … the real tragedy is that she murdered her own children and died in the process.

Let the pro-abortion advocates wail all they want—they can’t erase the brutal reality of what abortion truly is, the taking of innocent life. Amber Thurman’s story should not be held up as a rallying cry for “abortion rights.” Instead, it should stand as a dire warning of the deadly consequences of a culture that devalues human life from the moment of conception.

Three Ways to Support DISNTR


The Dissenter is primarily supported by its readers. The best way to support us is to subscribe to our members-only Substack site where you will receive all of our content ad-free, plus you will get member-only exclusive content.

Support us with a monthly donation on Patreon

Support us with membership to our ad-free Substack

Make one-time or monthly donation on Donorbox


👕 Or make a purchase from our online store. 👕
Make a Dogecoin Donation

- Advertisement -

Latest

Christmas Hymn Review: Hark! The Herald Angels Sing

Christmas Hymn Review: Hark! The Herald Angels Sing

There’s a reason some Christmas hymns endure for centuries. They don’t merely entertain or evoke warm holiday feelings—they proclaim truth. Continuing my series on Christmas hymns, I now turn my attention to one of those rare gems—Hark! The Herald Angels Sing. It...

Santa is Competing With Christ for the Worship of Your Children

Santa is Competing With Christ for the Worship of Your Children

Every December, a rotund figure clad in red velvet descends upon the collective conscience of Western civilization, not through chimneys as legend would have us believe, but through malls, movies, and mantelpieces. His name is Santa Claus—a jolly old saint, they call...

- Advertisement -

Subscribe

Store

Follow Us

- Advertisement -

- Advertisement -

You Might Also Like…

Christmas Hymn Review: Hark! The Herald Angels Sing

Christmas Hymn Review: Hark! The Herald Angels Sing

There’s a reason some Christmas hymns endure for centuries. They don’t merely entertain or evoke warm holiday feelings—they proclaim truth. Continuing my series on Christmas hymns, I now turn my attention to one of those rare gems—Hark! The Herald Angels Sing. It...

Santa is Competing With Christ for the Worship of Your Children

Santa is Competing With Christ for the Worship of Your Children

Every December, a rotund figure clad in red velvet descends upon the collective conscience of Western civilization, not through chimneys as legend would have us believe, but through malls, movies, and mantelpieces. His name is Santa Claus—a jolly old saint, they call...

Check Out the New “Jesus Mecha Christ” “Transformer” Toy

Check Out the New “Jesus Mecha Christ” “Transformer” Toy

A transforming Christ-meets-mecha toy? Yes, the “Jesus Mecha Christ” transforming toy actually exists. It's like someone sat down and said, “How can I mock both God and basic decency in one fell swoop?” This isn’t art or satire—it’s an abomination born from the unholy...

Christmas Hymn Review: Away in a Manger

Christmas Hymn Review: Away in a Manger

Previously, I wrote an article calling for discernment while scrutinizing the lyrics of the popular Christmas song, Mary Did You Know? I knew it would be a provocative piece, as it was meant to be. However, my intent was not to dissuade you from enjoying these tunes,...

Christmas Song Review: Yes, Mary Did Know

Christmas Song Review: Yes, Mary Did Know

The Christmas season has a way of draping everything in nostalgia. Familiar carols, the warm glow of lights, and the cozy rituals of family traditions tend to stir something deep within us. But more often than not, I hear a song that makes me stop and think—sometimes...

Don’t Lose Sight of the Gospel in the Incarnation of Christ

Don’t Lose Sight of the Gospel in the Incarnation of Christ

Christmas is upon us again—the season of twinkling lights, cheerful songs, endless shopping, and, yes, Santa with his elves performing acrobatics on our bookshelves. The world, predictably, is consumed with the “season” itself, offering little more than cheap...

- Advertisement -

Want to go ad-free with exclusive content? Subscribe today.

This will close in 0 seconds

Three Ways to Support DISNTR



The Dissenter is primarily supported by its readers. The best way to support us is to subscribe to our members-only Substack site where you will receive all of our content ad-free, plus you will get member-only exclusive content.

 

Support us with a monthly donation on Patreon

Support us with membership to our ad-free Substack

Make one-time or monthly donation on Donorbox


👕 Or make a purchase from our online store. 👕

This will close in 0 seconds