In a move that has raised eyebrows and stirred controversy, Fairfax County School Board member Karl Frisch was recently sworn into his second term on a stack of homosexual-themed books, a deliberate choice that diverges from the traditional practice of taking an oath on a religious text. Among these books, one notably included graphic content featuring children. This act, symbolic of Frisch’s stance, is a manifestation of the broader debate surrounding the inclusion of such books in school curriculums and libraries.

This incident provides a window into the ongoing discourse regarding the appropriateness of LGBTQ-themed books in educational settings. Books like “Lawn Boy” by Jonathan Evison, “Gender Queer” by Maia Kobabe, and “All Boys Aren’t Blue” by George M. Johnson, often targeted for removal from school libraries, delve into inappropriate themes of racialism, gender, and sexuality, sometimes through sexually explicit passages. “Flamer,” another book visible during Frisch’s swearing-in, has been banned in multiple jurisdictions due to its explicit content, including a scene where children are depicted instructing other children to masturbate into a bottle.

This controversy encapsulates a broader struggle over the narrative and content presented to students in schools. Proponents argue that such books provide essential representation and support for LGBTQ+ youths, offering them narratives they can relate to and learn from. However, The concern is over the exposure of children to sexually explicit material, especially without parental oversight, because such content negatively impacts their social development and morals.

The debate extends beyond these individual titles to the broader question of what constitutes appropriate educational material. This conversation is not just about specific books but about the values and messages being conveyed to the younger generation. The contention surrounding these books stems from the deranged progressive views on how to approach topics of sexuality and identity in an educational setting, especially for younger students.

The decision of a school board member to be sworn in on such books signals a clear stance in this debate, aligning with a progressive agenda that promotes sexual degeneracy while subverting a conservative view of family and sexuality at the cost of exposing young impressionable minds to adult themes. This act, emblematic of a larger cultural shift, reflects the priorities and values that are increasingly shaping educational policies and decisions.

The inclusion of LGBTQ-themed books in schools, and symbolic actions like those of Karl Frisch, have become flashpoints in a broader cultural and ideological battle over the nature of education, the role of schools in shaping societal values, and the boundaries of acceptable discourse in public institutions​​​​​​. It’s time to get your kids out of these Satanic religious indoctrination centers.