Last week, we reported that a homosexual YouTuber who once bragged about having a grotesque sexual encounter with his cat, and who also has made excuses for pedophilia, along with his homosexual partner, had purchased two boys through surrogacy. The new surrogacy trend in the United States is gaining steam and is quickly becoming a new battlefront for decent, sane people to stand up and oppose.

As I wrote previously, the practice of surrogacy (womb rental) and IVF, especially within the context of homosexual relationships, not only distorts the Biblical design of family but also involves deeply troubling ethical concerns. In IVF, multiple embryos are often created, with the inherent risk that several will not survive. This raises significant moral questions from a Christian perspective, as life is sacred and worthy of protection from conception.

In addressing the burgeoning issue of surrogacy, particularly among homosexuals, as illustrated by the recent case of Shane Dawson and Ryland Adams, it’s imperative we confront this with the clarity and candidness it demands. Surrogacy, a concept once confined to the pages of science fiction, is now a lived reality, often wrapped in the rhetoric of progress and personal liberty. However, beneath this veneer of modernity lies a stark, unsettling reality that challenges the very fabric of our moral and social constructs.

Let’s cut through the euphemisms. There is a severe disconnect here between reality and the fantasies of these clowns’ imaginations. What we are witnessing is the commodification of human life, where children are reduced to products, selected and customized to fit the desires of adults. This is a full-scale retreat from normal human decency as we’ve known it. The Bible is in no way ambiguous when it comes to the value of life and the sacredness of creation. “Before I formed you in the womb, I knew you,” declares Jeremiah 1:5. In stark contrast, the process of surrogacy, especially as it’s embraced by open, practicing queers, involves a clinical, detached selection of embryos, treating these nascent lives as mere commodities on a shelf.

Let’s walk through this for a moment. First, imagine being raised by these two weirdos. You’re in school and you’re talking to your friends. “Hi, my dads are queers who picked me out of a bundle of 12 embryos and implanted me in the womb of some strange woman so they could boast about themselves on social media at my expense.” Oh, and by the way, the simply tossed the other innocent lives away because they weren’t “optimal.”

But there’s more at play here. This isn’t just about the mechanics of birth—it’s a fundamental redefinition of the family unit as ordained by God. The traditional family structure, with a mother and father, isn’t a societal construct subject to revision but a divine institution. When same-sex couples engage in surrogacy, it’s not just a challenge to this divine institution, it’s an overhaul. By sidelining the natural order of creation, these arrangements negate the complementary roles of mother and father, which are pivotal in the upbringing of a child.

Now, let’s talk about the transactional nature of this whole affair. Surrogacy, in many cases, is not just an arrangement but a transaction, often involving hefty financial considerations. We’re not just talking about the actually noble act of adoption, where a child is welcomed into a loving home, but a calculated financial deal to acquire a child. This commercialization of childbirth is not just troubling, it’s profoundly disconcerting. Children are blessings, not products to be bartered.

In these times of moral ambiguity, the role of the church and its leaders is more important than ever. The church must not shy away from addressing these uncomfortable truths. It should stand as the guardian of this truth in an era increasingly inclined towards moral relativism. This isn’t about judgment, it’s about upholding a standard of divine truth that has guided humanity through centuries.